Legal Opinion
United States v. Reider
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 31, 1996No. 96-2022PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
The issue in this case is when'the defendant’s term of supervised release began. We conclude that the critical day is the one on which defendant was released on regular parole and, in the circumstances here, that he did. not violate supervised release as adjudged by the district court.
After pleading guilty to illegal drug offenses committed during October 1987, defendant was sentenced on January 17, 1989 to five year’s of incarceration to be followed by three years of supervised release. The sentence also authorized the Parole Commission in its discretion to release…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Gozlon-Peretz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Lupe COX, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PHELPS DODGE CORPORATION, and Chino Mines Company, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- United States ex rel. Precision Co. v. Koch Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States v. MeyersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. McGeheeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. FriedmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. RodebaughCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. HeckenliableCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.