Lupe COX, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PHELPS DODGE CORPORATION, and Chino Mines Company, Defendants-Appellees
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-Appellant Lupe Cox (“Cox”) appeals the district court’s decision following a bench trial that Defendants-Appellees Phelps Dodge Corporation and Chino Mines Company (collectively referred to as “Chino Mines”) were not liable under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981a, 2000e-2000e-17 (“Title VII”), for the gender-related hostile work environment to which the court found that Cox had been subjected. At trial, Cox asserted three claims: (1) that she had been subjected to sexual discrimination based on a hostile work…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- DeFunis v. OdegaardSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by98 opinions
- Green v. BransonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Rio Grande Silvery Minnow v. Bureau of ReclamationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Jordan v. SosaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Nova Health Systems v. FogartyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Walker v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.