Legal Opinion

Lupe COX, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PHELPS DODGE CORPORATION, and Chino Mines Company, Defendants-Appellees

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 28, 1994No. 92-2214PublishedCited by 98 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EBEL, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff-Appellant Lupe Cox (“Cox”) appeals the district court’s decision following a bench trial that Defendants-Appellees Phelps Dodge Corporation and Chino Mines Company (collectively referred to as “Chino Mines”) were not liable under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981a, 2000e-2000e-17 (“Title VII”), for the gender-related hostile work environment to which the court found that Cox had been subjected. At trial, Cox asserted three claims: (1) that she had been subjected to sexual discrimination based on a hostile work…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. DeFunis v. OdegaardSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by98 opinions

  1. Green v. BransonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  2. Rio Grande Silvery Minnow v. Bureau of ReclamationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  3. Jordan v. SosaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  4. Nova Health Systems v. FogartyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  5. Walker v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001

93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API