Legal Opinion

United States v. Friedman

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 10, 2009No. 07-4118PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, Circuit Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Charles Friedman pleaded guilty to bank robbery. 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). Varying dramatically from the 151- to 188-month range set out in the advisory Sentencing Guidelines, the district court sentenced Friedman to fifty-seven months’ imprisonment. The government appeals, claiming the sentence imposed by the district court is substantively unreasonable. Exercising jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we reverse Friedman’s sentence and remand the matter to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

II.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Kimbrough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Spears v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. United States v. Munoz-NavaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. United States v. CorneliusCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  2. United States v. SayadCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  3. United States v. WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  4. United States v. MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  5. United States v. BarnesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API