Legal Opinion

Rogers v. City of Oconomowoc

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1962PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.

Improper Claim.

The complaint alleges that on March 21, 1961, the guardian ad litem made a demand upon the city for compensation to the minor for the injuries already referred to and that more than ninety days have elapsed since the demand. A copy of the demand is incorporated in the complaint. Sec. 62.25, Stats., forbids a plaintiff to maintain an action against a city for damages until he shall first have presented his claim to the city council and the claim has been disallowed or not passed upon by the council within,ninety days after the claim was presented.

The city’s present contention is…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bielski v. SchulzeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Bent v. JonetWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Umnus v. Wisconsin Public Service Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Ermis v. Federal Windows Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Larson v. LesterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. City of Madison v. Hyland, Hall & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Caygill v. IpsenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Robinson Ex Rel. Robinson v. Mount Sinai Medical CenterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Copeland v. LarsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Quesenberry v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API