Legal Opinion

Myers v. Bailey

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 26, 1910No. 1479PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Mandamus by James Myers against Frank M. Bailey, District Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.

This is an original action for a writ of mandamus, to require the defendant, as judge of the district court of the Fifteenth judicial district of the state of Oklahoma, to certify to his disqualification to try a criminal case wherein the plaintiff herein is defendant. The affidavit for disqualification states generally that said judge is so biased and prejudiced against the defendant that he will not give said defendant a fair and impartial trial, and that by reason of said bias and prejudice this defendant cannot have a fair and impartial trial before said judge.

The contention of plaintiff…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ex Parte HudsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Prowant v. SealySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Pierce v. PierceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  3. Kanaskat Lumber & Shingle Co. v. Cascade Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1942
  5. Holloway v. HallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API