Legal Opinion
McGlothern v. City of Seattle
Washington Supreme Court
Decided July 20, 1921No. 16390PublishedCited by 14 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, French, J., entered November 17, 1920, dismissing an action for an injunction to restrain enforcement of a city ordinance regulating jitney busses, after a trial on the merits to the court!
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
Plaintiff,- in his own behalf and in behalf of others similarly situated, together with a large number of other persons who intervened in the action as plaintiffs, seek to enjoin the city of Seattle from enforcing the provisions of ordinance number 40886, entitled,
“An ordinance relating to and regulating the operation of certain kinds of ‘for hire’ motor vehicles, prescribing penalties for the violation thereof and declaring an emergency, ”
and to enjoin obedience by the city of its own resolution or action by which the plaintiffs were refused permits to operate jitney busses on certain…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Allen v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- State ex rel. Schafer v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1920
- Schoenfeld v. City of SeattleDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1920
3Cited by14 opinions
- Schlesinger v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
- Eugster v. City of SpokaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Eugster v. City of SpokaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Frick v. City of GaryIndiana Supreme Court · 1922
- State ex rel. Seattle & Rainier Valley Railway Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1923
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.