Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Seattle & Rainier Valley Railway Co. v. Superior Court

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1923No. 17127PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.

The relator, by this original proceeding in mandamus, asks this court to order the su perior court of King county to take jurisdiction of, proceed with, hear and determine an action instituted by the relator against Knowles and others, wherein the defendants are sought to be enjoined from operating jitneys on certain streets in the city of Seattle.

The complaint in the superior court alleged that the plaintiff in that action, the relator here, was the owner and operator of a street car line upon certain streets in the city of Seattle, under a franchise, and that the defendants were operating…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Webster v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Allen v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Puget Sound Traction, Light & Power Co. v. GrassmeyerWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  4. State ex rel. Martin v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  5. State ex rel. Schafer v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1920

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Cirese v. RidgeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  2. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. SchoenfeldtWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Davis & Banker, Inc. v. NickellWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Princeton Power Co. v. CallowayWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Ellison v. Rayonier IncorporatedDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1957

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API