Legal Opinion

Frick v. City of Gary

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1922No. 23,761PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEwbank, C. J.

Appellant was the owner and the driver of a “jitney bus” in the city of Gary at the time a city ordinance was enacted which forbade the drivers of such vehicles to receive and discharge passengers on certain of the streets of that city. The only -question presented for decision is the validity of a section of that ordinance, which, as amended, forbids said acts under penalty of a fine not exceeding $300. The amended section reads (in part) as follows: “It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to operate any vehicle, except street cars and taxicabs, engaged in the carriage of…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ex parte DickeyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Greene v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  3. In Re CardinalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Hadfield v. LundinWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  5. City of Memphis v. State ex rel. RyalsTennessee Supreme Court · 1915

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Pennington v. QuiggSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  2. Taylor v. SmithSupreme Court of Virginia · 1924
  3. City of Indianapolis v. Clint's Wrecker Service, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. City of Springfield v. StevensSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  5. Star Transportation Co. v. City of Mason CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1923

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API