Hopfer v. Staudt
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBrand, J.
The plaintiff Hopfer brought this action for damages arising out of an automobile collision. The defendants were E. T. Staudt and Los Angeles-Seattle Motor Express, Inc., a corporation, hereafter called LASME. There was a verdict for plaintiff and against both defendants, for $20,000, and judgment was entered thereon. Thereafter the defendant E. T. Staudt, acting for himself alone, moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The court allowed the motion and entered judgment for costs in favor of the defendant E. R. Staudt and against plaintiff. LASME appeals from the judgment against it,…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Judson v. Bee Hive Auto Service Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1930
- Bowen v. Gradison Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
- Hilgenberg v. ElamTexas Supreme Court · 1946
- McFarland v. Dixie MacHinery & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1941
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Cutsforth v. KINZUA CORPORATIONOregon Supreme Court · 1973
- Matter of Marriage of MullinaxOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- McDonald v. Ford Motor Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1975
- Wills v. PETROSOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Penrose v. Mitchell Bros. Crane Division, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1967
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.