Legal Opinion

Morrison v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 28, 1945No. Appeals, 155 and 156PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Jones,

The plaintiffs, husband and wife, sued the defendant for damages for injuries to the wife allegedly caused by the defendant’s negligence. The learned trial judge entered a compulsory nonsuit on the ground that the evidence adduced failed to show thé negligence alleged. The court en banc refused the plaintiffs’ motion to take off the nonsuit in an order from which they severally appeal.

In reviewing the action so taken by the court below, we are required to view the oral evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs, giving them the benefit of every fact…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kimble v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Smith Et Ux. v. Pittsburghi Rys. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Mervine v. Aronomink Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. Scerca v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  5. Redington v. Harrisburg Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lonasco v. VeillSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Gorel v. Comensky, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API