Legal Opinion

Lonasco v. Veill

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 19, 1945No. Appeal, 99PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, J.,

This is an appeal by plaintiff from the refusal of the court below to take off a compulsory nonsuit in his action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have resulted from the negligence of defendants. The trial judge entered the nonsuit on two grounds: (1) That plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law; and (2) that there was no evidence that either of the defendants was negligent.

The defendant Yeill was driving a coal truck, and the defendant Lakovich was operating a taxicab; they collided at the intersection of Eleventh and Christian…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Susser v. WileySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Robinson v. American Ice Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Riefer v. Niehl Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Greenberg v. McCuskerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  5. Ross Et Vir. v. Pgh. Motor Coach Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McKniff v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. Moore v. ZimmermanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Baxter v. BryanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  4. REPA v. NAPIERKOWSKIDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API