Lonasco v. Veill
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Rhodes, J.,
This is an appeal by plaintiff from the refusal of the court below to take off a compulsory nonsuit in his action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have resulted from the negligence of defendants. The trial judge entered the nonsuit on two grounds: (1) That plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law; and (2) that there was no evidence that either of the defendants was negligent.
The defendant Yeill was driving a coal truck, and the defendant Lakovich was operating a taxicab; they collided at the intersection of Eleventh and Christian…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Susser v. WileySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Robinson v. American Ice Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Riefer v. Niehl Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Greenberg v. McCuskerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Ross Et Vir. v. Pgh. Motor Coach Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- McKniff v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Moore v. ZimmermanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Baxter v. BryanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- REPA v. NAPIERKOWSKIDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2022