Legal Opinion
Maybaum v. Putnam County Office of Family & Children
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided February 18, 2000No. 67A01-9906-JV-223PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GARRARD, Senior Judge.
Appellants Susan and Robert Maybaum (Maybaums) appeal the trial court’s order, adjudicating their daughter a Child In Need of Services (CHINS). The Mayb-aums allege that the Putnam County Office of Family & Children (OFC) did not provide sufficient evidence to prove the allegations contained within the CHINS petition.
We reverse.
Facts and Procedural History
P.M. is the adopted daughter of Robert and Susan Maybaum. On November 6, 1998, the OFC received a report that P.M. had been sexually abused. During an interview, P.M. identified her father as the perpetrator. As…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Elkhart County Farm Bureau Cooperative Ass'n v. HochstetlerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- K Mart Corp. v. BrzezinskiIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
- Bahre v. METROPOLITAN SCH. DIST., ETC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Curtis v. ClemIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
3Cited by9 opinions
- Thomas v. CarlsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- In re K.B.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- Garmene v. LeMastersIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Hatchett v. Marion County Office of Family & ChildrenIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- CHINS: B T v. Indiana Department of Child ServicesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2023
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.