Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Garmene v. LeMasters

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 20, 2001No. 49A02-0005-CV-323PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VAIDIK, Judge

Case Summary

Richard F. Garmene, III appeals from the trial court's grant of a protective order requested by Kimberly LeMasters and the trial court's order prohibiting him from possessing any firearms. Because we find that Garmene was provided with sufficient notice of LeMasters' allegations and there was sufficient evidence to support the protective order and the prohibition on firearms, we affirm.

Facts and Procedural History

On February 14, 2000, LeMasters filed a petition for a protective order. The petition alleged that within the last six months Garmene had "threatened,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Anderson v. WeatherfordIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Flynn v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Maybaum v. Putnam County Office of Family & ChildrenIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Van Santen v. TreeceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. A.S. v. T.H.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Howard v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Wee Scots, LLC v. FlemingIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Angela R. Reed v. Sally L. AshcraftIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Anthony Flores v. Blake A. HudsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API