Thomas v. Carlson
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KIRSCH, Judge.
Sarah Thomas (“Mother”) appeals the trial court’s adjudication of her daughter, V.C., as a Child in Need of Services (“CHINS”) as well as the consolidation of the CHINS case with Christopher Carlson’s (“Father”) paternity action. Mother raises the following restated issues:
I. Whether the trial court erred in consolidating the CHINS action with Father’s paternity action;
II. Whether the trial court erred in adjudicating V.C. as a CHINS on grounds different than those set forth in the CHINS petition;
III. Whether there is sufficient evidence to support the CHINS adjudication…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sullivan v. American Cas. Co. of Reading, Pa.Indiana Supreme Court · 1992
- State Exchange Bank of Culver v. TeagueIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
- Patel v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
- Baker v. Midland-Ross Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1987
- City of New Haven v. Allen County Board of Zoning AppealsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- S.W. v. Indiana Department of Child ServicesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- J.V. v. Allen County Department of Family & Children ServicesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- M.C. v. Marion County Department of Child ServicesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- In the Matter of M.O., A Child in Need of Services, M.O., Child v. Indiana Department of Child Services, N.M., Mother, and Mi.O., Father, and Child Advocates, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017
- Beverly Czech v. James CzechIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.