Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

County of Santa Cruz v. Waterhouse

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 28, 2005No. H024127PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RUSHING, P. J.

Statement of the Facts and Case

Yacht Harbor Manor Mobilehome Park is owned and operated by defendants and respondents Kenneth Waterhouse and Waterhouse Corporation (Waterhouse).

Pursuant to the California Mobilehome Parks Act (MPA), which vests the power to issue permits for the installation of mobilehomes in California with the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD), Waterhouse applied for a permit to install a two-story mobilehome in the Yacht Harbor Manor Mobilehome Park. HCD initially rejected the application because it was incomplete, but…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sherwin-Williams Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Roble Vista Associates v. BaconCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. Lagrutta v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Griffith v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. Watson v. County of MercedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rotolo v. San Jose Sports & Entertainment, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. Hoffman v. SMITHWOODS RV PARK, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. Sequoia Park Associates v. County of SonomaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. Vieira Enterprises, Inc. v. City of East Palo AltoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. Linovitz Capo Shores LLC v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API