Legal Opinion

Griffith v. County of Santa Cruz

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 18, 2000No. H019474PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PREMO, J.

Following an administrative ruling that he had violated defendant County of Santa Cruz’s rent control ordinance by eliminating garbage service without a commensurate reduction in rent, plaintiff Harold Griffith challenged the decision via a petition for a writ of mandate. The first amended petition urges that the ordinance is preempted by or is inconsistent with state law provisions prohibiting commercial rent control and regulating mobilehome parks. The trial court disagreed. On appeal, plaintiff reiterates his arguments. We disagree and affirm the judgment.

Background

Plaintiff…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. SaundersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Gregory v. City of San Juan CapistranoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. Palos Verdes Shores Mobile Estates, Ltd. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cacho v. BoudreauCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Bevis v. Terrace View Partners, LP, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  3. Sc Manufactured Homes, Inc. v. Canyon View Estates, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. Village Trailer Park, Inc. v. Santa Monica Rent Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. County of Santa Cruz v. WaterhouseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API