City of Freeman v. Salis
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtKonenkamp, Justice
[¶ 1.] The circuit court dismissed a municipal petition for condemnation, ruling that the city council acted in bad faith and abused its discretion in resolving to condemn private property. Because the challenged conduct in this case cannot be classed as an abuse of discretion or bad faith under SDCL 21-35-10.1, we reverse the dismissal and order reinstatement of the condemnation action.
A
[¶ 2.] Richard and Barbara Salis own a home in Freeman, South Dakota. In 1996, they paid $1000 for a strip of railroad property adjoining their lot. This three and one-third acre corridor is approximately 100…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Bauman v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- United States v. Gettysburg Electric Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Pheasant Ridge Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Town of BurlingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
- Commonwealth Transportation Cabinet Department of Highways v. TaubKentucky Supreme Court · 1988
- Earth Management, Inc. v. Heard CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Spiska Engineering, Inc. v. SPM Thermo-Shield, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- City of Rapid City v. FinnSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- City of Rapid City v. FinnSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- The City Of Seattle, Res. v. Hugh K. Sisley And Martha E. Sisley, Apps.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2018