Legal Opinion
Spiska Engineering, Inc. v. SPM Thermo-Shield, Inc.
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided April 7, 2004No. NonePublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEIERHENRY, Justice.
[¶ 1.] This is an appeal arising from a judgment of the circuit court affirming the decision of an arbitrator and denying a motion to vacate an arbitration award.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
[¶ 2.] Spiska Engineering, Inc. (Spiska) and SPM Thermo-Shield, Inc. (Thermo-Shield) initially entered into a contract August 3, 1994. Subsequently, the parties added addendums and supplements to the original contract. The original contract granted Spiska exclusive rights in several European countries to distribute Thermo-Shield products. The subsequent adden-dums and supplements…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Forsythe International, S.A. v. Gibbs Oil Company of TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,863 A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. William F. McCollough Jeanene McCollough Husband and WifeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Shearson Hayden Stone, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Paul LiangCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- Barry Drayer v. Sidney Krasner, Leonard Miller, H. Hentz & Co., Inc. And Shearson Hayden Stone Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Painewebber Group, Inc. Painewebber, Inc. Mitchell Hutchins Asset Management, Inc. William J. Reik, Jr. William D. Witter, Inc. v. Zinsmeyer Trusts PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Spiska Engineering, Inc. v. SPM Thermo-Shield, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Sylver v. Regents Bank, N.A.Nevada Supreme Court · 2013
- DT-Trak Consulting, Inc. v. PrueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Damrow v. MurdochNebraska Court of Appeals · 2007