Legal Opinion
City of Rapid City v. Finn
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided August 6, 2003No. NonePublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEIERHENRY, Justice.
[¶ 1.] The City of Rapid City (City) filed a petition against Daniel and Melinda Finn (Finn), owners of Lot 23, seeking to condemn a portion of Lot 23. An action for declaratory judgment had already been brought by Wildwood Association against the City, Leo Hamm Ranch, L.L.C., Harley Taylor, and Red Rock Development Co., L.L.C. to determine the status of the property the City wished to condemn and whether the section line had been vacated. The trial court combined the actions. In regard to the condemnation action, the trial court ruled against the City. The City appeals.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pheasant Ridge Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Town of BurlingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
- Ericksen v. City of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1944
- Otter Tail Power Company v. MalmeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
- Basin Electric Power Cooperative v. PayneSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- Evans v. KingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Spiska Engineering, Inc. v. SPM Thermo-Shield, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Wildwood Ass'n v. Harley F. Taylor, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- City of Rapid City v. FinnSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003