Legal Opinion

The City Of Seattle, Res. v. Hugh K. Sisley And Martha E. Sisley, Apps.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 12, 2018No. 76114-5Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE THE CITY OF SEATTLE, a municipal ) No. 76114-5-1 corporation, ) ) s=2 cnc) G - Respondent, ) rn ) ci-tt co -n V. ) -= ) — 4-13Fi CPrn HUGH K. SISLEY and MARTHA E. SISLEY, ) : Fr r•-• husband and wife; HUGH K. SISLEY, ) •• —10 individually and on behalf of their marital ) community; ) ) Appellants, ) ) JOHN SANDIFER in his capacity as judgment ) creditor; ROOSEVELT DEVELOPMENT ) GROUP, LLC, a Washington limited liability ) company, in its capacity as lessee; ) UNPUBLISHED OPINION ROOSEVELT DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC ) (RDG, LLC), a…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Pheasant Ridge Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Town of BurlingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  3. City of Des Moines v. HemenwayWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  4. HTK Management, L.L.C. v. Seattle Popular Monorail AuthorityWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Htk Management v. Seattle Monorail Auth.Washington Supreme Court · 2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API