Legal Opinion

National Audubon Society v. Davis

District Court, N.D. California

Decided November 30, 2000No. C-98-4610-CALPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

LEGGE, District Judge.

This action arises from the passage by California voters of Proposition 4 on November 3, 1998. Proposition 4 enacted California Fish & Game Code § 3003.1 which, broadly speaking, bans the use of certain traps and poisons to capture or kill wildlife in the state.

Five different groups of parties are now involved in this litigation over Proposition 4: The National Audubon Society and other groups with similar interests (“plaintiffs”) brought this lawsuit against various California state officials and agencies (the “state…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McClafferty v. Portage Count Board of ElectionsDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009
  2. Kafka v. HagenerDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API