Legal Opinion

Kafka v. Hagener

District Court, D. Montana

Decided October 5, 2001No. 01-32-GF-DWMPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MOLLOY, Chief Judge.

I. Introduction

The Complaint in this case questions the constitutionality of Ballot Initiative 143, a measure approved by a majority of the voters of Montana in the November 7, 2000 general election. 1-143 amended Montana’s game farm laws to establish a permanent moratorium on issuance of new game farm licenses, to reimpose a prohibition on transfers of game farm licenses, and to prohibit game farm licensees from allowing killing of the animals under the game farm license for a fee. Plaintiffs argue that 1-143 abridges their rights guaranteed by Article I, Section 8…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Vance v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Maine v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Baldwin v. Fish and Game Comm'n of Mont.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Spoklie v. State of MontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. Kafka v. MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF FISHMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Kafka v. Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife & ParksMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Minnesota Deer Farmers Association v. State of Minnesota, TheDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2024
  5. Spoklie v. MontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API