State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Nello L. Teer Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtLaicb, J.
This proceeding was instituted before the Utilities Commission by the filing of a complaint by Teer. Consequently, the statute imposes upon Teer the burden of proving the facts essential *373to its right to relief from the rate relationship of which it complains. G.S. 62-75. Since the cost data and other circumstances concerning justification for the differential in rates of which Teer complains are more readily available to the participating railroads than they are to a complaining shipper, it may well be thought that in such proceedings as these, just as in proceedings instituted by the'…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- New York v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- L. T. Barringer & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Ford v. Rio Grande Valley Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1943
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Bird Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Carolina Utility Customers Ass'n Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
- Town of Taylorsville v. Modern CleanersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Thrifty Call, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Boren Clay Products Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.