State v. Steen
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWalters, J.
In this criminal case, we determine the reviewability on appeal of defense counsel’s deliberate decision at trial not to object to otherwise excludable hearsay testimony.
Before the Court of Appeals, defendant claimed that admission of testimonial hearsay, to which he had not objected at trial, violated his right to confront adverse witnesses under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. 1 The Court of Appeals concluded, at the first step of its analysis, that defendant had asserted “an error of law apparent on the face of the record” that was subject to appellate review under…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Freytag v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. ParkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. ChitwoodOregon Supreme Court · 2022
- State v. LovernCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- State v. MillsOregon Supreme Court · 2013
- State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. S.P.Oregon Supreme Court · 2009
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.