Legal Opinion

Hall v. City of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1941No. L. A. 17952Published

1Opinion of the Court

19 Cal.2d 198 (1941)

MARY E. HALL, Appellant,

v.

CITY OF LOS ANGELES (a Municipal Corporation), Respondent.

L. A. No. 17952.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

Dec. 18, 1941.

Porter C. Blackburn for Appellant.

Ray L. Chesebro, City Attorney, Frederick von Schrader, Assistant City Attorney, and Norman Brand, Louis A. Babior and Victor P. Spero, Deputies City Attorney, for Respondent.

THE COURT.

A petition for hearing in this case was granted to the end that further consideration be given to the contentions of the appellant. On such consideration we agree with the disposition of the appeal by the…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Cawthorn v. City of HoustonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  2. Douglass v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Sandstoe v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Hall v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Purdy v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1908

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API