Andrew Byars v. Bluff City News Company, Incorporated
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KEITH, Circuit Judge.
This case presents intriguing questions of single firm monopoly power under section 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2. 1 The principle issue presented is one of the most unsettled and vexatious in the antitrust field: under what circumstances does a monopolist have a duty to deal? 2
The plaintiff, Andrew Byars (Byars),-’had a long-standing business relationship with the defendant, Bluff City News Co. (Bluff City). 3 Bluff City changed ownership in 1970 and ended all of its business dealings with Byars. The plaintiff then brought this action, alleging that Bluff…
2Cases cited98 opinions
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by128 opinions
- United States v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- MCI Communications Corporation and MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. American Telephone and Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Port Dock & Stone Corp. v. Oldcastle Northeast, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- New York Ex Rel. Schneiderman v. Actavis PLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Steve L. McKenzie D.O. v. Mercy Hospital of Independence, KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
123 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.