Legal Opinion

Port Dock & Stone Corp. v. Oldcastle Northeast, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 23, 2007No. Docket 06-4908-cvPublishedCited by 338 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge.

Port Dock Holdings Corp., and its two subsidiaries, Port Dock & Stone Corp. and Gotham Sand & Stone Corp. (whom we will refer to collectively as Port Dock), appeal from the district court’s dismissal of their antitrust claim against their erstwhile suppliers CRH, PLC, Oldcastle Northeast, Inc., and Tilcon, Inc. (known eolleetively as Tilcon). 1 Port Dock & Stone Corp. v. Oldcastle Northeast, Inc., No. 05 Civ. 4292(DRH)(ARL), 2006 WL 2786882 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 26, 2006). Port Dock alleged that Tilcon monopolized the market for manufacturing crushed stone, or…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Cuoco v. MoritsuguCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  3. Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by338 opinions

  1. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, Maryland v. Citigroup, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  2. Starr v. Sony BMG Music EntertainmentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  3. Doninger v. NiehoffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  4. Camarillo v. Carrols Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  5. Stadnick v. Vivint Solar, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017

333 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API