Legal Opinion

Strauss v. Kunin

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 7, 1958No. Civ. No. 22151PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD (Parker), J.

The first five causes of action, alleged in the complaint, were for damages resulting from the flow of water, dirt, and debris from defendant’s property onto plaintiffs’ property. After a partial trial those causes of action were dismissed, and the trial proceeded upon the sixth cause of action. By that cause of action plaintiffs sought (1) to enjoin defendant from discharging water from a pipeline into a public street; (2) to compel defendant to remove the portion of the pipeline which extends under and across two or three feet of plaintiffs’ land; (3) for damages…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Darling v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Valdez v. PercyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. Nebel v. GuyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. ReeceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  2. Westbrooks v. Gordon H. Ball, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API