Legal Opinion

Reis v. Cox

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1982No. 13856PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKES, Chief Justice.

This appeal is taken from a summary judgment entered in favor of the defendant doctor in a medical malpractice action. The action arose from the defendant respondent’s alleged failure to remove a Penrose surgical drain from the plaintiff appellant’s abdomen following surgery. Summary judgment was entered on the ground that the applicable statute of limitations, I.C. § 5-219(4), had run, barring plaintiff’s cause of action. The primary issue to be decided on appeal is whether the trial court erred in concluding that there were no gen*436uine issues of material fact which would…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ruth v. DightWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Farmer's Insurance Company of Idaho v. BrownIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Mantz v. FollingstadNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Schaefer v. Elswood Trailer SalesIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Hill v. Squibb & Sons, ERMontana Supreme Court · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Idaho First National Bank v. Bliss Valley Foods, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1992
  2. McCoy v. LyonsIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Steinberg v. South Dakota Department of Military & Veterans AffairsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Tingley v. HarrisonIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Jack Ray Allen and Sandy Lynn Allen, Husband and Wife v. A.H. Robins Company, Inc., a Virginia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API