Reis v. Cox
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BAKES, Chief Justice.
This appeal is taken from a summary judgment entered in favor of the defendant doctor in a medical malpractice action. The action arose from the defendant respondent’s alleged failure to remove a Penrose surgical drain from the plaintiff appellant’s abdomen following surgery. Summary judgment was entered on the ground that the applicable statute of limitations, I.C. § 5-219(4), had run, barring plaintiff’s cause of action. The primary issue to be decided on appeal is whether the trial court erred in concluding that there were no gen*436uine issues of material fact which would…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ruth v. DightWashington Supreme Court · 1969
- Farmer's Insurance Company of Idaho v. BrownIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
- Mantz v. FollingstadNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
- Schaefer v. Elswood Trailer SalesIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
- Hill v. Squibb & Sons, ERMontana Supreme Court · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Idaho First National Bank v. Bliss Valley Foods, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1992
- McCoy v. LyonsIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
- Steinberg v. South Dakota Department of Military & Veterans AffairsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Tingley v. HarrisonIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
- Jack Ray Allen and Sandy Lynn Allen, Husband and Wife v. A.H. Robins Company, Inc., a Virginia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.