United States v. Mark Anthony Campbell
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Non-Argument Calendar.
1Per curiam
In United States v. Jones, 1 we held that after imposing sentence, the district court should elicit fully-articulated objections to the court’s findings of fact, conclusions of law, and the manner in which the sentence was imposed. The issue presented here is whether the Jones rule applies to supervised release revocation proceedings. We hold that it does.
I. BACKGROUND
In 1998, following his guilty plea for possession of stolen mail, Mark Anthony Campbell was sentenced to 33 months imprisonment and 3 years of supervised release. In December 2000, Campbell was released from prison and began…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. Charles Crawford, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Scott Evan JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Jennifer AguillardCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Alfred Octave Morrill, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- United States v. James InnocentCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
- United States v. SteeleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Stephen HunterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Jerry Sanchez CarrasquilloCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
- United States v. Henry SteigerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2024
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.