United States v. Jennifer Aguillard
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Per curiam
Jennifer Ford Aguillard appeals her 24-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release, contending that it is too long.
Aguillard concedes that 18 U.S.C. § 3583 authorizes the district court to revoke her term of supervised release and impose a maximum term of two years’ imprisonment. But she argues that although the policy statements of chapter seven of the sentencing guidelines are not binding, the sentencing court must at least consider them in revocation proceedings. Aguillard points out that under U.S.S.G. § 7B1.4 she would be subject to a three- to nine-month term of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. HumphreyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Cynthia Yvette AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- United States v. HofierkaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Kelvin Neal JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by185 opinions
- State v. BarnesOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Andrew Pretka v. Kolter City Plaza II, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- Edwards v. Prime, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- State v. BarnesOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Tiffany Williams v. Board of RegentsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
180 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.