Legal Opinion
United States v. Alfred Octave Morrill, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided February 16, 1993No. 91-8386PublishedCited by 158 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK and CARNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
Whether a bank teller is per se a vulnerable victim under section 3A1.1 of the federal Sentencing Guidelines is the sole issue in this case. That section instructs sentencing judges:
If the defendant knew or should have known that a victim of the offense was unusually vulnerable due to age, physical or mental condition, or that a victim was otherwise particularly susceptible to the criminal conduct,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Scott Evan JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Sim Ed MoreeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Gary PaigeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Douglas DedekerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Terry Lynn StinsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by158 opinions
- United States v. IreyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- United States v. VonnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Henry A. BosticCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Robert Clay Medlock, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Walter Henry Vandergrift, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
153 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.