Legal Opinion
Doe v. Ohio State University
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided March 10, 2017No. Case No.: 2:16-cv-171PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Plaintiff John Doe initiated this case against Defendants The Ohio State University (“OSU”), Javaune Adams-Gaston, Kelly B. Smith, J.D., Matthew Page, and Natalie Spiert, (collectively “Individual Defendants”). Plaintiff alleges that he has been harmed by false allegations of sexual misconduct and has brought the following claims against the Defendants: violations of Title IX of the Educational Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C. § 1681, et seq., violations of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Ohio and United States…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- John Doe v. Miami Univ.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- John Doe v. Marymount Univ.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2018
- Doe v. University Of MississippiDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2019
- Van Overdam v. Texas A & M UnivCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022
- Doe v. Miami UniversityDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2017
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.