Legal Opinion
Doe v. University Of Mississippi
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Decided January 16, 2019No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-CV-138-DPJ-FKBPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Daniel P. Jordan III, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Defendants in this sex-discrimination case ask the Court to dismiss Plaintiff Andrew Doe's Second Amended Complaint in its entirety. As detailed below, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [33] is granted in part but otherwise denied.
I. Facts and Procedural History
This case centers around a December 2, 2016 sexual encounter between Plaintiff Andrew Doe and Bethany Roe, both undergraduate students at the University of Mississippi. While both participants were intoxicated at the time, Doe and Roe agree that they had sexual intercourse on December…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Roe v. St. John's UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2024
- John Doe v. Oberlin CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Doe v. HaasDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2019
- Doe v. Louisiana State UniversityDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2020
- Doe v. University of MississippiDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2023
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.