Legal Opinion
Key Technology, Inc. v. Simco/Ramic Corp.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided July 12, 1991No. Civ. No. 90-985-FRPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRYE, District Judge:
The matter before the court is the motion (#76) of plaintiff, Key Technology, Inc. (Key Technology), for an order compelling defendant, Simco/Ramic Corporation (Sim-co/Ramic), to respond to its Requests for Production No. 1, 3, 7 and 8 and Interrogatory No. 4.
In its complaint, Key Technology claims that Simco/Ramic has infringed U.S. Patents No. 33,357 (patent ’357), 4,520,702 (patent ’702), and 4,830,180 (patent ’180), each of which is held by Key Technology. Key Technology also seeks a declaration that U.S. Patent No. 4,738,175 (patent ’175), which is held by…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lindemann Maschinenfabrik Gmbh v. American Hoist and Derrick Company, Harris Press and Shear Division, Commercial Metals CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Underwater Devices Incorporated v. Morrison-Knudsen Company, Inc., Morrison-Knudsen Company, Inc. v. Lester A. Haug, Don W. Schmid and Herman GuntherCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Status Time Corp. v. Sharp Electronics Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Choat v. Rome Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1978
3Cited by5 opinions
- Micron Separations, Inc. v. Pall Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995
- Kos Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Michlin v. Canon, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
- Central Sprinkler Co. v. Grinnell Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- JJK Mineral Co., LLC v. SwigerDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2013