Legal Opinion
Choat v. Rome Industries, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided December 11, 1978No. Civ. A. C77-78RPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HAROLD L. MURPHY, District Judge.
This action arises out of the alleged infringement by the defendants of certain patents issued to the plaintiff. Jurisdiction is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1338 and 1400(b). Presently pending before the Court are defendants’ motions for summary judgment and to compel production of certain documents. In addition, plaintiff’s counsel has petitioned the Court for permission to practice before the Court.
The evidence before the Court indicates that in the fall of 1966 the plaintiff showed drawings and photographs of a tree shear, developed by him, to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- SCM Corp. v. Xerox Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1976
- Jack Winter, Inc. v. Koratron Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1971
- In The Matter Of Harry Henderson, DebtorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Minerals & Chemicals Philipp Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. The Milwhite Co., Inc., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Brown v. RichardsonDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- In Re Spalding Sports Worldwide, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Detection Systems, Inc. v. Pittway Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1982
- Sneider v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1980
- Comair Rotron, Inc. v. Minebea Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Bausch & Lomb, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.