Legal Opinion
Status Time Corp. v. Sharp Electronics Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 17, 1982No. 81 Civ. 1051 (CLB)PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NINA GERSHON, United States Magistrate:
The defendant, Sharp Electronics Corporation (“Sharp”), has moved pursuant to Rule 37(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to compel production of documents. The plaintiff in this action, Status Time Corporation (“Status”), alleges that Sharp has infringed its United States patent entitled “Talking Solid State Timepiece” as follows: On December 21, 1976 the patent for the “Talking Solid State Timepiece” was issued in the name of Robert W. Lester to Camin Industries Corporation as the assignee thereof. The patent was then assigned to the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
- United States v. Louis KovelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Sperry v. Florida Ex Rel. Florida BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Murdock v. City of MemphisSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- In Re Claus Von Bulow, Martha Von Bulow, by Her Next Friends Alexander Auersperg, and Annie Laurie Auersperg-Kneissl v. Claus Von BulowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Bowne of New York City, Inc. v. AmBase Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Compagnie Francaise d'Assurance Pour le Commerce Exterieur v. Phillips Petroleum Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Chubb Integrated Systems Ltd. v. National BankDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1984
- Golden Trade v. Lee Apparel Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.