Legal Opinion
Micron Separations, Inc. v. Pall Corp.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided January 20, 1995No. Civ. A. No. 94-11377-WGYPublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT PALL CORPORATION’S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY (#69)
COLLINGS, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
There are only two items remaining in dispute respecting Defendant Pall Corporation’s1 Motion to Compel Discovery (#69). The first relates to the extent to which Micron Separations, Inc.,2 having raised the defense of reliance on an opinion of counsel to a charge of wilful infringement, must produce documents which otherwise would be protected by the attorney-client privilege and/or work product doctrine codified in Rule 26(b)(3), Fed.R.Civ.P. The second…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Underwater Devices Incorporated v. Morrison-Knudsen Company, Inc., Morrison-Knudsen Company, Inc. v. Lester A. Haug, Don W. Schmid and Herman GuntherCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Julie Holmgren v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Julie Holmgren v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Handgards, Inc. v. Johnson & JohnsonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1976
- The Duplan Corporation v. Moulinage Et Retorderie De Chavanoz, Deering Milliken, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- In Re Seagate Technology, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- In re Grand Jury SubpoenaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
- Dunhall Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Discus Dental, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1998
- Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. v. General Scanning, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1997
- Chiron Corp. v. Genentech, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2001
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.