Legal Opinion
Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. Richardson
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 28, 1999No. Civil Action 98-1154 (HHK)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KENNEDY, District Judge.
This case concerns a challenge to a March 25, 1998 decision of the Department of Energy’s Office of Hearings and Appeals (“OHA”) that awarded refunds totaling $1,716,784 from a fund created pursuant to the Citronelle Settlement Agreement to eleven agricultural cooperatives and fourteen airlines. The agricultural cooperatives have intervened in this case, but the airlines have not. Before the court are plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, defendant’s motion to dismiss or for summary judgment, and intervenor-defen-dants’ motion for summary judgment.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re Department of Energy Stripper Well Exemption LitigationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1986
- Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Department of EnergyTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1982
- City of Long Beach v. Department of EnergyTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1985
- Powerine Oil Co. v. Federal Energy AdministrationTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1976
- International Drilling & Energy Corp. v. WatkinsTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Consolidated Edison Company Of New York, Inc. v. Bill RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000