Legal Opinion
In Re Department of Energy Stripper Well Exemption Litigation
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided July 7, 1986No. MDL 378PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
THEIS, District Judge.
Before the Court is a settlement agreement of historic proportions, which represents the culmination of substantial efforts on the part of the litigants involved. This monumental multidistrict litigation has spanned eight years, involved hundreds of parties, entailed voluminous pleadings and concerned a variety of factually and legally complex issues of substance and procedure. At this juncture, the task of the Court is the appropriate distribution of over one billion dollars in escrowed stripper well overcharge funds. The settlement agreement currently…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- United States v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Piambino v. BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Texas American Oil Corporation v. United States Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Con Edison Co NY Inc v. Bodman, SamuelCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- United States Department of Energy v. "The States"Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1988
- Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. BodmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Mid-America Dairymen, Inc. v. HerringtonTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1989
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.