Legal Opinion
Powerine Oil Co. v. Federal Energy Administration
Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals
Decided May 28, 1976No. 9-31PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ESTES, Judge.
On September 16, 1975, plaintiff, Powerine, was denied exception relief by the Federal Energy Administration (FEA) from its July and August entitlements purchase obligations arising under 10 CFR § 211.67, which required payments to be made by Powerine during the months of September and October, 1975. Following the December 22, 1975 decision and order of the FEA denying Powerine’s administrative appeal, it sought declaratory and injunctive relief in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. After a trial on the merits, the District Court found that…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Bowles v. WillinghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Charles O. Sorenson v. Casper W. Weinberger, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Railroad Commission of Texas v. Rowan & Nichols Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Exxon Corp. v. Department of EnergyDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1981
- City of Long Beach v. Department of EnergyTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1985
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Federal Energy AdministrationTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1977
- International Drilling & Energy Corp. v. WatkinsTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1990
- The Rio Grande, El Paso and Santa Fe Railroad Company and Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company v. Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.