Legal Opinion

In Re Robert's Tours & Transportation, Inc.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 2004No. 22953PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

DUFFY, J.

Appellant E Noa Corporation (E Noa) appeals from two orders of the Public Utilities Commission (PUC): (1) Decision and Order No. 17075, dated July 14, 1999, granting the application of Appellee Robert’s Tours and Transportation, Inc. (Robert’s) to extend its operating authority on 0‘ahu [hereinafter, Order # 1]; and (2) Order No. 17278, dated October 12,1999, denying E Noa’s motion for reeonsideration of Decision and Order No. 17075 [hereinafter, Order # 2].

On appeal, E Noa argues that: (1) the PUC addressed matters outside the application submitted by…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Korean Buddhist Dae Won Sa Temple v. SullivanHawaii Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Richardson v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Camara v. AgsaludHawaii Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Franks v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1993

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sierra Club v. Department of TransportationHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Taniguchi v. Association of Apartment Owners of King Manor, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Hoopai v. Civil Service CommissionHawaii Supreme Court · 2004
  4. In the Interest of DoeHawaii Supreme Court · 2005
  5. In Re BrandonHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API