Legal Opinion
Shapiro v. Carothers
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 11, 1990No. 8592PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
The plaintiffs, Jeffrey Shapiro and Cedar Island Marina, Inc., have appealed from the dis*189missal of their administrative appeal. They had sought review of the defendant’s denial of the application for the permits needed to expand Cedar Island Marina in Clinton. The plaintiffs claim that the trial court incorrectly concluded that they had not complied with the statutory requirements governing administrative appeals. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts are relevant to this appeal. The plaintiffs applied to the water resources unit of the department of environmental…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chestnut Realty, Inc. v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Tarnopol v. Connecticut Siting CouncilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Sheehan v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Village Creek Homeowners Assn. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Borough of Newtown v. Department of Public Utility ControlConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Tolly v. Department of Human ResourcesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Brunswick v. Inland Wetlands CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Rochester v. PellechiaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Greco v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Berka v. City of MiddletownConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.