Legal Opinion
Steinfur Patents Corp. v. Meisel-Galland Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided May 22, 1939No. Nos. 4941, 6512PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
BYERS, District Judge.
Hearing on exceptions to report and findings made by Special Master to whom was referred the question of alleged violation of injunction and infringement by the individual defendants, William E. Popkin in the first cause and Michael Miller in the second.
The Special Master has found infringement as follows:
As to Popkin: Patent No. 1,573,200 (Process) at least as to claims 6, 7, 19, and 22. Patent No. 1,564,378 (Product) at least as to claims 1, 6, 11, 12, 14, 16, 21, and 22.
As to Miller: Patent No. 1,564,378 at least as to claims 11, 12, 14, and 16.
That each defendant has…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hartford-Empire Co. v. OBEARNESTER GLASS CO.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
- American Foundry & Mfg. Co. v. Josam Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
- Steinfur Patents Corporation v. William Beyer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
- Steinfur Patents Corp. v. J. Meyerson, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1931
3Cited by1 opinion
- Catalin Corp. of America v. SlosseDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1939