Legal Opinion

Steinfur Patents Corporation v. William Beyer, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 19, 1932No. 21PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWAN, Circuit Judge.

The patents in suit relate to the art of bleaching and dyeing furs and the like. One patent is for a process of treating fur skins; the other for the products resulting from the practice of tho process. Tho product patent No. 1,564,378 was issued December 8, 1925, and some two months before the process patent, No. 1,573,200, although both applications were filed in the Patent Office on the same date, May 3, 1924. All the claims of each patent were held valid and infringed by the District Judg-e, whose careful and thorough discussion of the issues below is reported in 56…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. O'Reilly v. MorseSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  2. Merrill v. YeomansSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Le Roy v. TathamSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
  4. Holland Furniture Co. v. Perkins Glue Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
  5. American Fruit Growers, Inc. v. Brogdex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. General Electric Co. v. Wabash Appliance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company v. Berkley and Company, Inc., E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company v. Berkley and Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  3. Buono v. Yankee Maid Dress CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
  4. Eversharp, Inc. v. Fisher Pen Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1961
  5. Union Simplex Train Control Co. v. General Ry. Signal Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API