Legal Opinion
Steinfur Patents Corp. v. J. Meyerson, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided September 9, 1931No. Nos. 4940, 4939, 4989, 4988PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, District Judge.
The four above actions were tried separately, but for convenience they were briefed together.
The issues involved therein are largely the same, differing of course in each action as to the alleged infringement and in some other particulars that will be noted.
Each action is brought by the plaintiff in equity for relief by injunction and damages for the alleged infringement of patent No. 1,564,378, issued by the United States Patent Office to Hyman Stein, William E. Austin, and Irving Liebowitz, assignors to Stein Fur Dyeing Company, Inc., for improvement in bleached and…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Coffin v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Riehle v. MargoliesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Deering v. Winona Harvester WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Grubb v. Public Util. Comm'n of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Electro-Metallurgical Co. v. Krupp Nirosta Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- Steinfur Patents Corporation v. William Beyer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
- Caterpillar Tractor Co. v. International Harvester Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1940
- Hazeltine Research, Inc. v. Avco Manufacturing Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1954
- Steinfur Patents Corp. v. Meisel-Galland Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1939