Sterling v. Mayflower Hotel Corp.
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Seitz, Chancellor:
Plaintiffs seek a preliminary injunction restraining the consummation of an agreement of merger between defendant corporations. They assert that the merger plan was not approved by a quorum of disinterested directors and that the terms of the agreement are both fraudulent and unfair to the so-called minority stockholders of the corporation to be merged.
*23Plaintiffs are certain minority stockholders of the defendant Mayflower Hotel Corporation (hereafter called “Mayflower”). At a directors’ meeting held March 6, 1952, Mayflower’s directors approved a plan whereby Mayflower was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Blish v. Thompson Automatic Arms Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1948
- Cole v. National Cash Credit Ass'nCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1931
- Porges v. Vadsco Sales Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1943
- Italo-Petroleum Corporation of America v. HanniganSupreme Court of Delaware · 1940
- State v. Penn-Beaver Oil Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- David J. Greene & Co. v. Dunhill International, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1968
- Puma v. MarriottCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1971
- Gries Sports Enterprises, Inc. v. Cleveland Browns Football Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
- David J. Greene & Co. v. Schenley Industries, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1971
- Sterling v. Mayflower Hotel Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1952
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.