Italo-Petroleum Corporation of America v. Hannigan
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Layton, C. J.,
delivering the opinion of the Court:
The first question for decision is whether the plaintiff, under the assignment of the notes sued on, was entitled to maintain the action in his own name; and, preliminarily it is to be said that the plaintiff is not an innocent holder for value; nor did the notes pass to him by endorsement under Section 31 of the Negotiable Instruments Law (Sec. 3155, Rev. Code 1935) for the reason that the assignments were not written on the instruments nor upon a paper attached thereto.
The court below, adopting the reasoning in the case of Levy v. Levy, 78…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Guth v. Loft, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1939
- Pritchard v. NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Keenan v. EshlemanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1938
- Federal United Corp. v. HavenderSupreme Court of Delaware · 1940
- Cahall v. LoflandCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1921
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Sterling v. Mayflower Hotel Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
- Singer v. Magnavox Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1977
- Kerbs v. California Eastern Airways, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
- Blish v. Thompson Automatic Arms Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1948
- Taussig v. Wellington Fund, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.