Legal Opinion

Puma v. Marriott

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided October 20, 1971PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHORT, Vice Chancellor.

This is a stockholder’s derivative action which challenges the fairness of a transaction entered into by Marriott Corporation (Marriott), a Delaware corporation, whereby Marriott, in exchange for 313,000 shares of its common stock, acquired all of the stock of six corporations principally owned by members of the Marriott family. De fendants are those members of the Marriott family and others (Marriott Group) whose stock was acquired, four of whom were directors of Marriott (inside directors), and four of the remaining five directors (outside directors), one having died…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Sinclair Oil Corporation v. LevienSupreme Court of Delaware · 1971
  2. Sterling v. Mayflower Hotel Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
  3. Beard v. ElsterSupreme Court of Delaware · 1960
  4. Johnston v. GreeneSupreme Court of Delaware · 1956
  5. David J. Greene & Co. v. Dunhill International, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1968

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  2. Weinberger v. UOP, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983
  3. Cede & Co. v. Technicolor, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1994
  4. Revlon, Inc. v. MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1986
  5. Zapata Corp. v. MaldonadoSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API