Legal Opinion
Moore v. Dixon
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided November 11, 1994No. S94A1079, S94X1128PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Carley, Justice.
Harlon and Emma Harris are the previous owners of property upon which they operated a mobile home park and a “public water system” as defined in the Georgia Safe Drinking Water Act of 1977 (Act). OCGA § 12-5-172 (11). In compliance with the Act, the Harrises had been issued a permit to operate the water system. OCGA § 12-5-179. One of the conditions of the Harrises’ permit was
that the water service area will be limited to customers residing or conducting business on property under the permittee’s ownership. Should the permittee desire to serve drinking water to customers on…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Atlanta, Knoxville & Northern Railway Co. v. McKinneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Horkan v. City of MoultrieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
- Westbrook v. ComerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Shannondoah, Inc. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Betallic, Inc. v. DeavoursSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Golden Peanut Co. v. BassCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- De Castro v. DurrellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- Taylor v. Kennestone Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- City of Statham v. Diversified Development Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Effingham County Board of Commissioners v. Park West Effingham, L.P.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.